Joined: Jan 2012
Latest From The 9th Circuit Court
« Thread Started Today at 8:09pm »
Case: 11-55169 02/29/2012 ID: 8085389 DktEntry: 21 Page: 1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 29 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. C OURT OF APPEALS
DAVID ANDERSON, Lt. Col; et al., No. 11-55169
Plaintiffs – Appellants, D.C. No. 8:10-cv-00031-JVS-
v. Central District of California,
CHRISTOPHER COX, an individual; et
Defendants – Appellees.
Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner.
The renewed motion for summary affirmance of this appeal is denied
because the arguments raised in the opening brief are sufficiently substantial to
warrant further consideration by a merits panel. See United States v. Hooton, 693
F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Appellees’ request to stay the briefing schedule pending disposition of the
motion for summary affirmance is denied as moot.
The answering brief is due 30 days after the date of this order. The optional
reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief.